Bug #5857

Fix compilation problem annotations to work in procedural component type code editor

Added by Tuukka Lehtonen almost 3 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:On holdStart date:
Priority:4Due date:
Assignee:Hannu Niemistö% Done:


Category:User ComponentsSpent time:-
Target version:-
Release notes:
Tags: procedural, regression, user-component
Story points-
Velocity based estimate-


In #5812 the procedural user component code editor was changed to be based on the the Eclipse standard TextEditor to get undo/redo working.

The only remaining problem with the procedural UC code editor is that it doesn't produce proper compilation problem annotations for the editor. The compilation procedure of a procedural expression differs somewhat from the standard SCL module compilation problem calculation and I do not know how to make this work.

Related issues

Copied from Platform - Bug #5812: Use Eclipse TextEditor implementation in procedural compo... Closed 2015-04-30 2015-04-30


#1 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen over 2 years ago

  • Due date deleted (2015-04-30)
  • Target version deleted (1.19.0)
  • Start date deleted (2015-04-30)
  • Release changed from 25 to 29

#2 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen about 2 years ago

  • Release changed from 29 to 31

#3 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen almost 2 years ago

  • Release changed from 31 to 39

#4 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen over 1 year ago

  • Release deleted (39)

#5 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen over 1 year ago

  • Tags changed from procedural, user-component to procedural, user-component, regression

#6 Updated by Tuukka Lehtonen over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to On hold

Also available in: Atom PDF